Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Collaboration and Peer Reviews - Essay typesetters caseThere argon disadvantages, however, such as sometimes having ones ideas rejected or importantly altered before they are put on paper, and having to accommodate other populations schedules and life. unrivaled of the major advantages to collaborating on a project is that one gets a disaccordent set of expertise that fuck inform the perish being done. Specialization is key in w wide variety of fields, because the meat of knowledge and experience in the world is exploding at a much greater rate than soulfulness undersurface actually keep up with it. Thus collaborating allows someone to access knowledge and expertise they whitethorn not otherwise have, which give the bounce provide different points of view, subtlety to an argument, or even correct errors that are made in the original judgement. Another benefits of collaborating on projects is having another person to bounce ideas off of, that can be more critical than one us ually is to ones self. Sometimes other people can see errors in thinking that another person cannot, and this help protect anyone collaborating on a project from accidentally publishing things that might not be accurate when viewed critically. It is very, very difficult to be thoroughly critical about ones own ideas, so having another person who can do that can be incredibly helpful on a variety of levels. While quislingism has a number of advantages, it also has some disadvantages. Collaborating necessarily means compromise. Sometimes people result differ on where to put emphasis, or perhaps on even more major issues such as whether or not something is an argument that they should be making. Collaborating means that sometimes each persons ideas will be heavily edited before they get out, which can lead to somewhat less fictive or outside the box thinking. Furthermore, collaborating takes a lot more time than working on something but can one has to accommodate their collaborato rs schedule, life and so on, so instead of only when working when and how one wants, one has to sometimes wait for feedback, go over things several times and so forth. Collaboration does have some disadvantages that detract from its overall advantages. whizz of the things I learned through reviewing my peers work is how much easier it is to see negative things in another persons work than ones own. After reviewing a peers work, I went back and looked for those same issues in my own, and many of them were present. Furthermore, I learned that it is much easier to see what is done improperly (bad grammar, structure errors and so on) than to appreciate what is done well. One of the major advantages of having a peer review my paper was catching errors in logic or colloquy that I would not see. Obviously I created the ideas and arguments I use when writing a paper, so when I read it back to myself it always possesss perfect sense I know what Im lecture about. Another person, however , can only glean what your argument means from the writing you put on the page, so it can really highlight things that you have not communicated well enough, or that do not make sense without added detail. One of the disadvantages to having a peer review my work before I submit it is that sometimes having someone else review my work can